Spring
Snow
Yukio Mishima, 1966
We
live in an age without heroic death.
Nobody
in the world would be happier to know that his life was nearly inseparable from
his art than the bodybuilding Japanese power bottom Yukio Mishima, who spent his
entire artistic career trying to reconcile the two. Some folks will tell you that you
shouldn’t judge a work of art based upon the life of the artist but I’m not one
of them. For example, I think it’s really useful to know that Fitzgerald was a
hysterical alcoholic. I am of the opinion that context is important to enjoying
or understanding anything, and that knowing more about an artist will always make a
work of art deeper and richer. I can think of few artists whose lives loom more
monolithically over their work than Yukio Mishima. That might be one of the
reasons I like him so much, he was so dramatic and over-the-top compared to your average sweater-clad author. Mishima
painted on a different, larger canvas than the one upon which some MFA-toting writer
might work. His life was his bibliography. What you should know: Mishima was
Japan’s most famous writer, and a multiple Nobel nominee, before he and four
members of his private army (of a sort, I think of it as more of a boy’s club,
like the Boy Scouts mixed with a martial arts organization, where Mishima could watch
athletic young men march around in designer uniforms) stormed a Japanese
Defense Force base, kidnapped a general, and before the assembled soldiers delivered
a speech about power, glory, action, the Emperor, the shape of contemporary
Japan, and Westernization, a speech that no one listened to, and then, finally,
Mishima committed ritual suicide by disembowelment. Having read many of his
books, and read much about him, it’s hard not to think of this all as being
planned, manufactured, as some sort of fatal performance art. Harmony of pen
and sword. Other things you should know: Mishima was a bodybuilder, and a
homosexual, though he had a wife and children. He was a singular, contradictory, individual
human being. There’s probably never been a cat quite like Mishima, which is an
achievement in and of itself.
Spring Snow is the first book of the Sea of Fertility tetralogy, a cycle of
four novels about sex, death, art, rebirth, struggle, beauty and purity. They
were Mishima’s final work. The story takes place in 1912, a few years after the
first Russo-Japanese War, the war in which Japan took to the global stage as a
modern imperial power. Throughout history it’s been common for a rising
imperial power to pick a fight with an empire that is crippled, old, weak. The
United States took on old man Spain during the Spanish-American War, and thus
announced herself to the world. It’s a kind of really violent debutante ball.
At the Battle of Tsushima the Imperial Japanese Navy sank twenty-one Russian ships,
including seven battleships, while only losing three ships of their own. The casualties were something like six thousand dead Russian sailors, and a hundred dead Japanese sailors. In many ways the Russo-Japanese War was a rehearsal for the brutal wars of the 20th Century: trench warfare, gas attacks, doomed charges and massive naval conflicts. A fascinating subject.
On
the surface Spring Snow is a very
simple love story: Kiyoaki Matsugae, the son of the wealthy Marquis Matsugae,
and grandson of a man lionized as a pillar of the Meiji Restoration (an event
in Japanese history in which power was transferred from the Tokugawa Shogunate
and returned to the Emperor) carries on a doomed affair with a childhood
friend, Satoko, the beautiful and refined daughter of the Count Ayakura. The
Matsugaes are enormously wealthy, but their lineage has humble origins, and
little historical prestige beyond the grandfather. The Ayakuras have a name,
imperial connections, and little else. Satoko is betrothed to a princeling so
the two of them carry on their affair in secret, at cheap boarding houses.
Kiyoaki impregnates Satoko, which brings much shame and distress to their
families; she is forced into an abortion and escapes to a convent, where she
shaves her head and turns her back to the world. Kiyoaki makes the journey to the
convent, which is high in the snowy mountains, but she refuses to see him, and
the cold gives him pneumonia and he dies at twenty. It’s about a lot more than
that, though. It’s about the conflict between old and new, East and West, soft
and strong. Mishima is very psychological, like Dostoevsky, and his characters
are always a mess of personalities so strong that they cannot help but conflict
when they meet. Kiyoaki, a teenager, is ruled by his emotions, he has no
rationality and he lives a directionless life. He has no willpower. He is very
self-absorbed, and his environment provides him little in the way of warmth, comfort, or emotional support. He's a very lost and lonely person. Satoko, who is two years older and thus already an old maid, is controlled, reserved, elegant, and she quietly bears the
misfortune of being a woman in this particular time and place, where she is
merely an object for the prestige of men. The Matsugaes are vigorous and
stupid. The Ayakuras are regal and complacent.
I
haven’t yet read the other three books in the Sea of Fertility, though I intend to. I gather that the plot is
that Honda, one of Kiyoaki’s school friends, an intelligent, dedicated, serious
man, believes that he finds Kiyoaki’s spirit reincarnated in various people
throughout his life. So Kiyoaki is the original incarnation, and then in Runaway Horses he encounters him again,
in a new body, in The Temple of Dawn
another form, and The Decay of the Angel
a final form. Sounds like an interesting idea. I can’t wait to get through all
of them.
I
had struggled with the book I read just before this (Period by Dennis Cooper, which I didn’t finish and I don’t intend
to) and was feeling really down on myself because I couldn’t bring myself to
finish a 130-page book. Period was
sloppy, lazy, hazy, ugly and pointless. It read as if almost zero effort was
put into writing it. So I was sitting around, despondent, with an awful taste
in my mouth that I just couldn’t get rid of, and I said to myself: what’s the
opposite of a sloppy, lazy book? Mishima was the first thing that came to mind.
Mishima’s prose is stunningly beautiful, full of rich, luxurious texture, and
fine detail, golden detail. He moves from the hot action of a sword stroke to
the cool silk of a kimono with an uncanny ease. It’s very precise, very
masculine and powerful writing. Very clear, lucid, and easy to follow, sort of akin to Ernest Hemingway, though the similarities end there. Mishima
isn’t given to ostentatious displays of punctuation. He might be one of the
most naturally talented writers I could think of. What a burden walking around
with such talent burning inside must have been!
It
must be said that Mishima was definitely a far-right author. He was radically
conservative. He might be the only ultraconservative writer that I can really
stomach for an extended period (or at least I hope so, since the Sea of Fertility is about 1200 pages
long). Maybe Louis Ferdinand Celine, maybe I can take him for a similar length.
Mishima, though, was a strange sort of conservative. He wasn’t a bigot, and he
certainly wasn’t a Nazi, and he thought that World War Two was the work of “War
Profiteers,” but he was very opposed to Westernization and he yearned for a
return to an ephemeral, purified Japan. And it’s a point in Mishima’s favor
that he didn’t support any regimes that were actively involved in the killing
of human beings, unlike Celine, who wrote anti-Semitic pamphlets in
Nazi-occupied France, or like Borges, who guzzled celebrity while the military
dictatorship murdered tens of thousands of people.
Though
I would consider myself firmly on the opposite end of the political spectrum
from Mishima I must say that Mishima’s philosophy is not without its allure.
It’s a very brutal, unforgiving philosophy but in a lot of ways he’s right. He
believes that people have the right to a dignified death of their choosing,
which I agree with, and I don’t think it’s at all controversial to say that one
of the utensils of capitalism is deindividualization. People, who could have
been great human beings, are reduced to consumers, or cogs in a machine.
There’s a saying: the nail that sticks up gets hammered down. Mishima believed
that’s how society defeats people, by turning them into nails. One of the other
things I appreciate about Mishima is that he is all about self-reinvention,
about turning yourself into a “complete man” who is strong enough to handle
great art and enormous emotions. I guess where Mishima and I differ is that he
sees a samurai as a complete man and I see, I dunno, Che Guevara. There’s a
great Henry Rollins essay (a Mishima disciple if there ever was one) where he talks
about how bodybuilding changed his life, and as he absorbed the lessons communicated
to him by the Iron he felt the years of fear, humiliation, and self-loathing
melting away under the deluge of his self discovery, and that bodybuilding keeps him mentally sharp and emotionally strong. I can’t say that I’m not
jealous. I wish that as a teen someone had shown me the way to destroy the
adult world. Instead I was shown the way to let the adult world destroy me.
Every time I read a Mishima book I get in this strange mood where I want to do
a bunch of push-ups and get big dumb prison muscles and read poetry and such.
Of course I never do. Harmony of Pen and Sword!
Since
I have three more books remaining in the Sea
of Fertility, and I don’t want to run out of things to say about Yukio
Mishima I’m going to end this review (or whatever you want to call it) here,
and say that I’m very much looking forward to finishing the other novels in
this cycle. Mishima was a unique and fascinating character. While I may not
agree with Mishima on a lot of things, I appreciate the amount of care and
artistry and beauty he put into his novels. All artists must believe that their
work has meaning, but few go to such great lengths to bring that meaning to
life.
Really great review! I read "The Sailor Who Fell From Grace..." on your recommendation once upon a time, and liked it a lot. I've always meant to read the "Sea of Fertility" cycle, this'll bump it up on my list.
ReplyDeleteCool description of the life cycle of empires, that Rollins essay is iconic, too!
-Lorenzo