Friday, April 27, 2012

El Tercer Reich




The Third Reich (2011)
Roberto Bolaño

This kind of game creates a pretty interesting documentary urge. It’s as if we want to know exactly how everything was done in order to change what was done wrong.

            It’s absolutely astounding to me that one of the greatest and most interesting writers of the last twenty years could have such a backlog of unpublished work, enough for his publishers and heirs to put out a half-dozen books since his death in 2003. Whoever rejected this book in 1989, 1990 must surely be kicking themselves now (if it was in fact rejected, to be honest I don’t actually know). If I had books like this just sitting around in my desk drawer doing nothing I’d be set for life. One facet of Bolaño’s legend--his cultish and confusing mythology--that I’ve always found particularly enthralling is that his entrance into fiction writing was motivated, at least partially, by purely mercenary reasons: he spent the first part of his life as a vagabond poet, wandering up and down Latin America, until finally settling down in Spain, where he got himself a wife and kids, and knowing that he was dying and that there is no money in poetry, no money at all, turned to fiction writing in order to secure his children’s future after his passing. This was his first book, the first one he wrote, and I like to imagine him sitting at his desk every day with dollar signs in his eyes, knowing that this was the only way he could do it. Most aspiring writers, if they wanted to make a big pile of cash, would write cheesy patriarchal detective fiction, or politically disgusting children’s fantasy novels, or something similar, but not Roberto Bolaño, he’s way too smart and ambitious for that and he knows he’s still got to look at himself in the mirror. His first novel is of course, like everyone else’s first novel, a metaphor using tabletop war games to explain how we still ache for the return of fascism (or a time machine to reverse the mistakes of the past) even if we don’t realize it or think better of ourselves (how liberal and educated we are, certainly no Nazis; our in-laws are Jewish, we have a gay nephew, one of our neighbors is black, we could never be a horrible fascist.)

            The book is pretty simple: it’s the journal of a young man, Udo Berger, the German champion of a board game called The Third Reich, who goes on vacation to a seaside Spanish town with his pretty girlfriend Ingeborg. While there they meet another German couple, go out drinking and dancing, sit on the beach, fraternize with vaguely threatening locals the Lamb and the Wolf, Udo has some sexual tension with the woman who runs the hotel but she keeps her legs shut so he humps a maid instead, at night the sea is black, thoughtless and menacing like a predator, and so on. There’s a death and eventually all the Germans return to Germany one way or another, save Udo, who locks himself in his dark reeking hotel room to practice and refine his revolutionary new Third Reich strategy with a disciple of sorts: a muscular and horrifically scarred hulk who rents pedal boats and sleeps on the beach, not Spanish, possibly South American, a grunting mysterious threat named El Quemado: The Burned One, The Burn Victim.

            Though this is Bolaño’s first novel and it’s pretty rough, not as mature, his prose isn’t as good as it would later be and the dialogue is sometimes cringe worthy and it meanders quite a bit, even for Bolaño, but it’s still quite evident that this is a Bobby Bolaño book and that name on the cover means you are in for something good. It’s a real mark of quality. It’s not his best book (The Savage Detectives or 2666) but it’s certainly not his worst (looking at you, Amulet). All his hallmarks are there: long ruminations on literature and poetry and how they relate to state violence, tourists (outsiders) who travel to a place and discover the real outsiders, the people really on the fringe who drag the tourists into their ugly underworld, our latent unrealized potential for fascism, narrators or central characters who may or may not be going slowly insane or just falling apart from pressure and stress, vague threats from indeterminate sources, generalized modern world bourgeois anxiety, and the blistering away of the mundane and banal surface to reveal the violence and darkness at the core of our societies and ourselves.

            A Bob Bolaño book is always such a special gift. They excite a hunger in me, a real voraciousness. An almost animalistic feral book love. I feel like I’m a pretty slow, plodding reader but not when I’m reading Bolaño. Bolaño sets me on fire: I finished Nazi Literature in the Americas in a single afternoon, 2666 in a week. The Third Reich took me a couple days. I’ve been dog sitting for my girlfriend’s parents for the last few days, gentle relaxed mornings with a cup of coffee and this Vizsla on my lap, when I get off work evenings with a beer and a pastrami sandwich and the dog again… what a life. A fellow could get used to this. If they kept on putting out Roberto Bolaño books like they've been doing I’d be in paradise.

            Roberto Bolaño is my favorite writer for a lot of reasons. I recommend him to anyone who asks and will listen. I can and will ramble on about Bolaño when I’m drunk at a bar but this is the first time I’ve really tried to sit down and articulate what I like about him. Almost all of the books I read were written and published before I was born by writers who died before I was born (there’s so many books out there that I can’t really read all the classics and keep up with what’s being published now so I stick mostly with the classics) and I feel like a lot of books that have been published recently that I have read just plain aren’t very good (up your ass with a stick Dave Eggers and Brett Easton Ellis) and have little to nothing say and no interesting ways to say it, and that the world of American letters is in a really sorry state, so I guess what I’m trying to say is that I think Bolaño is the first writer I’ve read whose books make me feel like I’m part of something important, a secret discovery, a secret someone took to the woods and buried in a shallow hole in the roots of a tree and I later dug up, horrified; in on the ground floor of a zeitgeist, a movement, and that part of that movement is mine and mine alone. I feel included and in on something. I also feel like a lot of authors popular these days are fake transgressive, like they play act at being shocking and avant-garde but they’re really just conservative, tedious and boring (for example Chuck Palahuniuk, the worst writer in the history of the English language) whereas with Bolaño I don’t feel like he’s being phony about anything. I find his prose and writing skill worthy of worship and the level of detail he can get into a novel astounding. He speaks to me like we're equals. He’s the perfect writer (a eulogist, really) for the end of the 20th Century, a hundred years that were so ugly for so many people. I think I might be obsessed with him and I’m not at all worried about it.

            Also, and I don’t have any proof of this but it’s something I feel has to be true: there aren’t many American writers around these days that I could think of who could produce a politically acceptable novel. Ninety percent of American writers teach creative writing at some public college somewhere and, therefore, have a stake in maintaining the status quo even if they think they don’t, and aren’t going to rock the boat, not in any real way. Sort of like how NBC is never really going to tell you how many children were disintegrated by General Electric cruise missiles today, or how many mutants were born in a fifty-mile radius around a Superfund site. The writer is institutionalized, part of the state apparatus. What a tragedy. Of course there’s worse things in the world than a public college (nearly everything I can think of is worse) so maybe I’m overreacting but I don’t think it’s helped to get any teeth back into our limp wrist culture, as if anyone actually wants some teeth, and if the state is violent and obscene, and a writer works for the state, doesn’t that just make him part of the propaganda machine? It’s a stupid and confused feeling, I know, but this is what I think about when I read Bolaño.

            Mostly though, what I like about Bolaño is that I find him inspirational, if that doesn’t sound too dorky and stupid. When I read him I get the feeling that I could do this, that anyone could—but most importantly that I could—that in Bolaño I’ve found someone who speaks the same language as me, after years of searching, and that language is pretty awesome to hear (I can finally have a conversation with someone), that it’s in my grasp, and that all it takes is a determination and a desire to paint outside the lines, to stand against boring institutionalized MFA literature, especially the really pernicious kind that infects this country and has since the 1970s and makes us stupider and duller and supports the violent sadistic goals of the state, to stand for something and put it into words. That it doesn’t take a fancy NYU writing degree to write a book, just a bibliography and a pair of eyes and one or two ears and some balls.

Saturday, April 21, 2012

Justine






Justine (1957)
Lawrence Durrell

           
           
            Some writers I wouldn’t want to engage with socially. I just don’t like their books, or I find their politics repulsive, or I imagine that they were assholes, and then there are writers like Lawrence Durrell, who I would drop anything to spend an afternoon with, sitting on the balcony of some bar with dark beer and bread and cheese, shooting the shit, learning from him. He was kind of an old-fashioned sort of British world-traveller, the kind that they don’t make any more, a man with politics likely just as unbearable as Borges’ politics were but, like Borges, a writer whose writing is so good that I find myself unable to give a hoot, a man who wandered around the Mediterranean, started spontaneous and modern literary movements with Henry Miller and Anaïs Nin, moving from government post to government post. Rhodes, Alexandria, Corfu, Yugoslavia…
             
          Justine is the first part of Durrell’s most famous and well-regarded work, The Alexandria Quartet (the other three books are Balthazar, Mountolive, Clea), a series of experimental modernist novels about a tormented love triangle (it’s sort of a love octopus, with a tentacle everywhere) viewed from different angles, a different angle in each book. In this book the angle is an unnamed narrator who is trapped between two women:  the simple, sweet and loyal Melissa, an impoverished dancer in a bar and the sort of woman a man should marry; and the magnetic and carnivorous Justine, a lodestone of sexuality, a cannibalistic man-eater that men would break their necks to get a glimpse of from across a crowded room. The book is achronological, it has the rhythm of a man sitting in the rubble of his life sifting through painful old memories; there isn’t any order or sense to when a memory surges up from your gut (that’s where an ugly or painful memory is, in your stomach), they just come when they come, one leading you to another. The tone is also pretty interesting, part romance novel and part travel guide, sort of like if a National Geographic met a Playboy though that isn’t entirely right.  It’s not pornographic. It’s not even racy at all, certainly not as racy as I was expecting from a man who had a deep and long-lasting friendship with Henry Miller, author of Crazy Cock. Though, as I understand it, some of his early books were banned for obscenity so maybe he just got it out of his system by the time he wrote Justine. It sort of reminds me of an old painting of a harem, like a Delacroix or something… one with tons of fine gilt detail where you can really smell the sweat, the musk and the hookah smoke, where bored dark-eyed girls sit on cushions fanning themselves and looking downward, waiting miserably and nervously for their turn.
             
          The book definitely fits in a genre that I think should be a genre but isn’t yet. I don’t know what you’d name it but it’s mostly about one thing: white Europeans in the Colonies doing ugly things to each other.  There are a million books like that… The Stranger, The Quiet American...

I’d say almost without hesitation that Justine is by far the most beautifully written book I’ve ever read. Very sensuous and emotionally rich, very luxurious and exotic. This is a book that has a smell (redolence), that has a sound (clanging weekend bazaar), I know where I am when I read this book; I’m in Alexandria. I used to live around the corner from this Ethiopian market. It was in the bottom floor of an apartment complex, and I’d go there sometimes for toilet paper or soap. It wasn’t really a convenience store, mostly what they sold were spices. Racks and racks of spices. Curries, dried peppers, tins of desiccated things I’d never seen before and were never a part of my cooking. It smelled like a wizard’s laboratory in this store, the smell was sometimes so overpowering it would wrack my nerves…it smelled like ancient secrets, and that’s what I imagine this book smells like. The prose in this book is very high quality, just the absolute finest stuff. Some prose is “workmanlike” and gets the job done (Steinbeck, say) but this is something else… this is loveliness.  I’d drag myself across the Mojave on broken legs to write a sentence like “…etiolated flowers of afternoons spent in anguish, tossing upon ugly beds, bandaged by dreams.” I'd staple my nutsack to a revolving door to write something extraordinary that Durrell could probably do without thinking in one afternoon on a Greek island on the beach with a beer and nothing else but the waves.

One thing I really loved about this book is how deep the characterization is. I don’t really have any clue what most of these characters look like, with a few exceptions, but I know exactly what they are like internally, in their souls. Durrell’s skill at forging metaphors really stands out when he’s describing someone’s essence, for example, something that really struck me was a line about the titular Justine: “She could not help but remind me of that race of terrific queens which left behind them the ammoniac smell of their incestuous loves to hover like a cloud over the Alexandrian subconscious. The giant man-eating cats like Arsinoe were her true siblings.” I don’t know if she’s tall or short or anything, but I know what she is (and goddamn what images Durrell uses) and what she is is elemental, tempestuous, amoral in the way that the ocean is amoral. The ocean calls to men like a siren, and it will kill a man as surely as anything, and has taken the lives of innumerable men, but there is no guiding force behind it. But what a way to go: death in the arms of the sea, maybe the only death worthy of manhood.

But, really, the main character of this story is the city of Alexandria. It’s where Durrell directs his most loving attention. Alexandria is an ancient, endless, eternal city like a dark dense jungle where age, rot, endless chaotic growth and decay build upon each other and the weight of history and timelessness enervates and entombs the inhabitants. History here is heavy, burdensome. In a lot of ways it reads like some made-up fantasy city from Borges or Calvino where time never passes, I mean to me a timeless city of minarets, labyrinthine rat warren ghettoes and spicy fumes on a narrow isthmus between the cold sea and a saline blood-colored lake sounds fantastical but it isn’t, Alexandria is a real place and it’s still there. Alexandria was there before any of us were, and it’ll be around after we’re all gone. I just looked up airplane tickets: a round trip is about thirteen hundred dollars at the cheapest. People spend at least that much to go to places that aren’t nearly as interesting: Hawaii, Japan, Los Angeles, Las Vegas, San Francisco. I think most of those places sound tedious and boring. Japan is where people go to fondle teenagers dressed up like cartoon characters, and Las Vegas is for blowing a life’s savings and pawning your old lady’s wedding ring but Alexandria, by contrast, is one of the most important cities in the history of mankind. I’m positive you could fondle a teenager or lose a lot of money in Alexandria, but it’s almost impossible to overstate how important that city has been to the development of Western Civilization, whereas it’s really easy to exaggerate the importance of Los Angeles or Dallas. Alexandria was a nexus of history for a long, long time. Celestial objects with massive gravitational fields distort space-time, forming a dip or a well around them in which smaller objects fall into and circle like around a drain. Significant cities are like that as well: they force history into orbit.

Unfortunately as pretty as this book is I’m not really sure what it’s about, what the deeper meaning is. That may be a failing on my part. It’s lyrical and metaphorical and richly executed but I don’t know to what end Durrell is working towards. Supposedly it’s an allegory for the Second World War but the novel is so internalized and solipsistic that I’m at a loss to tell you what Durrell is trying to say about it. Perhaps I have to read the other three books to find a resolution. I looked it up on good old Wikipedia and it says The Alexandria Quartet is an “exploration of relativity and the notions of continuum and subject–object relation, with modern love as the subject” but I’m not sure what that means, if it means anything at all. However, this book is pretty enough that I’m willing to accept it on its aesthetic value alone, and for that reason I would give it a hearty recommendation for anyone who is interested in scaling the magnificent heights that a true prose artist can lift you towards. Millions stampede to the Mona Lisa every year but as anyone knows it’s just a pretty picture.   





Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Powell's Books

I just spent a week in Portland, Oregon, with my girlfriend, and blew a ton of bread in the world famous Powell's Bookstore. It's an enormous place, and I feel like I could spend a year there and still not see everything. It was of course like heaven to me.

Here's what I picked up:

Kobo Abe, The Face of Another
Charles Bukowski, Post Office
William S. Burroughs, The Place of Dead Roads
Lawrence Durrell, The Alexandria Quartet (Justine, Balthazar, Mountolive, Clea)
Lawrence Durrell, Prospero's Cell
William Gaddis, The Recognitions
John Hawkes, Second Skin
Cormac McCarthy, Outer Dark
Andre Malraux, Man's Fate
Henry Miller, The Colossus of Maroussi
Yukio Mishima, The Decay of the Angel 
Yukio Mishima, Runaway Horses 

Currently reading Justine right now. Seems good so far, and I'll have another review up soon.